| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Intestinal parasites predominantly coccidian parasites are a common cause for diarrhea in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted during January 2009-December 2010. A total of 1,088 stool samples from 544 seropositive HIV positive cases were examined microscopically for ova and cyst using wet mount preparations and stained smears. Out of 544 patients, 343 had prolonged diarrhea for more than 4 weeks, 57 had acute diarrhea of lesser than 7 days and 144 were asymptomatic cases who attended out-patient department; included in this study after taking consent from patients. Enteric pathogens were detected in 274 (50.36%) of the 544 patients. Results and Conclusions: The parasites identified were Cryptosporidium (135), Isospora belli (42), Cyclospora (12), Microsporidia (02), Entamoeba histolytica (49), Hookworm (34). Intestinal parasites in chronic diarrhea were significantly higher than the acute diarrhea (63.05% vs. 7.35%; P < 0.05). Parasitic pathogens were frequently associated with HIV-positive patients with diarrhea in Western India. Stools of all HIV-positive patients with diarrhea should thoroughly be investigated to identify etiologic agents for proper management.
Keywords: Chronic diarrhea, Coccidian parasites, Entamoeba histolytica
|How to cite this article:|
Mathur MK, Verma AK, Makwana GE, Sinha M. Study of opportunistic intestinal parasitic infections in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. J Global Infect Dis 2013;5:164-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Mathur MK, Verma AK, Makwana GE, Sinha M. Study of opportunistic intestinal parasitic infections in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Oct 28];5:164-7. Available from: https://www.jgid.org/text.asp?2013/5/4/164/122012
| Introduction|| |
Infectious diseases appeared to be receding from certain parts of the world in the mid-1950s, but due to the emergence of certain diseases today, microbial health threats are once more a source of concern. These diseases are in some cases resurgent, like tuberculosis and some completely new to humans, such as cryptosporidiosis, isosporiasis, microsporidiosis and cyclosporiasis. The reasons for emergence differ by disease. The emergence of diseases affecting humans is due to many different factors, depending upon the particular disease.  A new niche for infection may also be created by environmentally acquired or genetic immune deficiencies on the part of the host. The epidemic of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is one such example, which has left us vulnerable to many opportunistic infections. 
Several enteric infections occur with increased frequency in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS and some of these are more likely to be severe, recurrent and persistent and associated with extra intestinal disease. Intestinal parasitic infections of the gastrointestinal tract are a major cause of morbidity in developing countries. Though in most of these cases, pathogenic organism could not be identified, but there are many possible causes of diarrhea, including common bacterial and parasitic infections. Common parasites associated with HIV infected persons are either well-established enteric pathogens, e.g., Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia and Strongyloides stercoralis or an opportunistic pathogen, e.g., Cryptosporidiums, Microspordia, Isospora and Cyclospora. Only a small percentage of individuals harboring the intestinal pathogenic parasites suffer from symptomatic disease in an immunocompetent host, but with the advent of HIV/AIDS the scenario has changed. The rate of infection with a particular enteric parasite in HIV/AIDS patient depends upon the endemicity of a particular parasite in the community. ,
Since the diarrheal diseases due to parasitic infections in HIV/AIDS patients is on the rise during recent times, the present study was conducted on seropositive HIV/AIDS patients with or without history of diarrhea over a period of 2 years in the Department of Microbiology of M.P. Shah Medical College, Jamnagar. The aim of this study was to determine the intestinal parasites in HIV/AIDS patients with and without diarrhea.
| Materials and methods|| |
Retrospective data of Guru Gobind Singh Hospital, Jamnagar has been reviewed to find out the intestinal parasitic load in HIV patients. A total of 1,188 stool samples from 544 patients were examined for coccidian parasites during January 2009-December 2010. In the laboratory, macroscopic and microscopic examination was carried out from all the freshly passed stool samples of patients. The sample was concentrated by formal ether concentration technique and subjected to normal saline and iodine wet mount preparation from the concentration material. Smears were prepared from the concentration material and stained by modified Ziehl Neelsen stain for detection of intestinal coccidian parasites.  Prepare a smear from the sediment obtained by the formal ether oocyst concentration technique. Air-dry the smear fix the smear with methanol for 2-3 min. In modified Ziehl Neelsen stain, slides were made from concentrated smear and heat fixed slides were stain with unheated carbolfuchsin for 15 min followed by decolorization with 1% acid alcohol for 10-15 s.
Smears were washed off with water and counterstain with methylene blue (0.5%) for 30 s. Wash off with water and stand the slide in a draining rack for the smear to drug. Smears were examined using oil immersion objective.
| Results|| |
In this study, a total of 1,088 stool samples from 544 seropositive HIV patients were examined for parasitic infections. Out of 544 seropositive cases, 400 were symptomatic cases and 144 were asymptomatic patients. The symptomatic patients were further divided into two groups according to the duration of diarrhea as acute (57) and chronic diarrhea (343). Among the total seropositive patients, 274 (50.36%) showed parasitic infections, which include 42.27% from chronic diarrhea stool samples, 7.35% from acute diarrhea samples and 0.73% from the stool of asymptomatic cases. Among the total seropositive patients, 98.54% of the parasites were identified from symptomatic patient samples and 1.45% parasites in asymptomatic cases [Table 1].
|Table 1: Distribution of intestinal parasitic cyst in HIV seropositive cases|
Click here to view
In this study, five different types of intestinal parasitic cysts and one helminthic ova were observed and the most common among them was Cryptosporidium parvum (135), followed by E. histolytica (49), Isospora belli (42), Hookworm (34), Cyclospora (12) and Microsporidium (02). Age distribution in this study group showed that the lowest age of the case whose stool examined was 20 years and highest age was 65. The age distribution results showed maximum number of intestinal parasites were identified from the age group 20 years to 30 years followed by 31-40, 41-50 and >51 year age groups. The study showed that more than 95% of parasites were identified in young and middle age group of patients, i.e., between 20 years and 50 years. In the age group, greater than 50 year, which was 20.65% of total study population, the intestinal parasites were observed in only 2.55% subjects [Table 2].
This study showed that approximately 69.70% of the identified intestinal parasites were coccidian parasites, whereas 30.29% were the protozoans and helminthes. The most common coccidian parasite identified was C. parvum 135 (49.27%). In this study, only two cysts were identified as Microsporidial cyst - a least commonly identified parasitic cysts. E. histolytica was 49 (9%) and Hookworm ova were 34 (6.25%) [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
The emergence and pandemic spread of the AIDS is the greatest challenge to public health in modern times. HIV infection, a world-wide infection, is a serious problem in the present day. A high rate of infection is found in many regions of the world, including the Southeast Asia. In India, HIV infection is a major problem. Continued progression of AIDS pandemic and its association with intestinal parasitic infections is now a serious concern. ,
In the present study, 50.36% of intestinal parasites were identified from the stool samples of seropositive HIV patients. It is in contrast to studies by Pape et al. from Peru where 57.33% of parasites were identified. In the year 1993, Cotte et al. in France revealed the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestations to be 70.6%, which was very high as compared with our studies. In another study, Brandonisio et al. in Italy revealed the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestation in HIV/AIDS patients to be 27.92%. ,,
These parasitic infections have been commonly reported from different centers of India. Prasad et al. from Lucknow had reported that intestinal parasitic infestation is seen in >50% seropositive HIV patients.  In the study, conducted by Mohandas et al. from Chandigarh observation was on 120 HIV seropositive patients and reported the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestations to be 30%.  Kumar et al. during 2002 in his study on 150 HIV/AIDS patient found the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestations to be 30% in Chennai.  The difference in prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestations can be due to the difference in geographical distribution of parasites and personal hygienic and sanitary habits. The difference in prevalence can also be due to different selection of cases with different immune status and difference in method of stool examination. The patients might acquire multiple parasitic infections because of poor sanitary conditions.
In the present study, the most predominant parasite was Cryptosporidium and was reported in 24.80% seropositive HIV patients. In symptomatic patients, i.e., patients having diarrhea, the Cryptosporidium cyst was found to be 24.26%. Other studies have revealed similar findings. In Brazil, Moura et al. in the year 1989, found the prevalence of Cryptosporidium to be 18.2% whereas in another study conducted in the Brazil by Cimerman et al. revealed the prevalence to be 7%. Chacin et al. in Venezuela, studied the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in HIV/AIDS patients found Cryptosporidium in 41.3% of the patients. Anand et al. from Canchipur (Manipur) in the year 1996 reported the prevalence of Cryptosporidium as 46.6%. ,,, In Northern part of India, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium was found to be 11%, by Prasad et al. in the year 1995-98.  In another study, conducted in Chandigarh by Mohandas et al. 2002 found Cryptosporidium in 13% of HIV/AIDS seropositive patients.  In Chennai, Kumar et al. found that 12%, of the stool samples were positive for Cryptosporidium and was opposite to studies of Northern part of India.  Cryptosporidium was found to etiological agent for diarrhea in 10-20% of patients with AIDS worldwide. 
Isospora is infrequently associated with diarrhea due to AIDS in the USA and Europe (about 2%) and is in contrast to our study where 7.70% of the total stool samples were found to be positive for I. belli. In some of the countries i.e., Brazil (9.9%), Zaire (12%), Zambia (16%) and Haiti (12%) I. belli is a commonly isolated in patients with AIDS and chronic diarrhea.  Cyclosporaa coccidian parasite is a common finding in Haiti (11%), but it was not a common isolate in this study (<1%).This study similar to the results of US and Tanzanian where patients with AIDS and chronic diarrhea (<1%) were positive for Cyclospora. , Studies from various parts of the world show contrasting prevalence rates with marked geographical variations. This emphasizes the need for thorough investigations of these patients to identify pathogens for proper management [Table 4].
| Conclusion|| |
Parasitic infection is a common finding in HIV associated chronic diarrhea cases. The present study has shown that Cryptosporidium was the most important emerging pathogen in HIV-positive patients with diarrhea in Western India. Simple direct, concentrated and stained smear of stool examination can help in identification of enteric parasites in the majority of patients. Detection of etiologic agents will help clinicians to decide appropriate management strategies.
| References|| |
|1.||Barsoum RS. Parasitic infections in transplant recipients. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2006;2:490-503. |
|2.||Escobedo AA, Núñez FA. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in Cuban acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. Acta Trop 1999;72:125-30. |
|3.||Stark D, Barratt JL, van Hal S, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis JT. Clinical significance of enteric protozoa in the immunosuppressed human population. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009;22:634-50. |
|4.||Kashyap B, Sinha S, Das S, Rustagi N, Jhamb R. Efficiency of diagnostic methods for correlation between prevalence of enteric protozoan parasites and HIV/AIDS status - An experience of a tertiary care hospital in East Delhi. J Parasit Dis 2010;34:63-7. |
|5.||Garcia LS, Bruckner DA, Brewer TC, Shimizu RY. Techniques for the recovery and identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts from stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:185-90. |
|6.||Framm SR, Soave R. Agents of diarrhea. Med Clin North Am 1997;81:427-47. |
|7.||Baveja UK. Manual on Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Opportunistic Infections Associated with HIV/AIDS. National Institute of Communicable Diseases (Govt. of India) & National AIDS Control Organization (Govt. of India); 2001. p. 51-2. |
|8.||Pape JW, Verdier RI, Boncy M, Boncy J, Johnson WD Jr. Cyclospora infection in adults infected with HIV. Clinical manifestations, treatment, and prophylaxis. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:654-7. |
|9.||Cotte L, Rabodonirina M, Piens MA, Perreard M, Mojon M, Trepo C. Prevalence of intestinal protozoans in French patients infected with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1993;6:1024-9. |
|10.||Brandonisio O, Maggi P, Panaro MA, Lisi S, Andriola A, Acquafredda A, et al. Intestinal protozoa in HIV-infected patients in Apulia, South Italy. Epidemiol Infect 1999;123:457-62. |
|11.||Prasad KN, Nag VL, Dhole TN, Ayyagari A. Identification of enteric pathogens in HIV-positive patients with diarrhoea in northern India. J Health Popul Nutr 2000;18:23-6. |
|12.||Mohandas K, Sehgal R, Sud A, Malla N. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic pathogens in HIV-seropositive individuals in Northern India. Jpn J Infect Dis 2002;55:83-4. |
|13.||Kumar SS, Ananthan S, Lakshmi P. Intestinal parasitic infection in HIV infected patients with diarrhoea in Chennai. Indian J Med Microbiol 2002;20:88-91. |
|14.||Moura H, Fernandes O, Viola JP, Silva SP, Passos RH, Lima DB. Enteric parasites and HIV infection: Occurrence in AIDS patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1989;84:527-33. |
|15.||Cimerman S, Cimerman B, Lewi DS. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Brazil. Int J Infect Dis 1999;3:203-6. |
|16.||Chacin-Bonilla L, Guanipa N, Cano G, Raleigh X, Quijada L. Cryptosporidiosis among patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Zulia State, Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992;47:582-6. |
|17.||Anand L, Dhanachand C, Brajachand N. Prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of opportunistic and non-opportunistic intestinal parasitic infections in HIV positive patients in Manipur. J Commun Dis 1998;30:19-22. |
|18.||Punpoowong B, Viriyavejakul P, Riganti M, Pongponaratn E, Chaisri U, Maneerat Y. Opportunistic protozoa in stool samples from HIV-infected patients. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1998;29:31-4. |
|19.||Abaza SM, Makhlouf LM, el-Shewy KA, el-Moamly AA. Intestinal opportunistic parasites among different groups of immunocompromised hosts. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 1995;25:713-27. |
Manish Kumar Mathur
Department of Microbiology, LRS Institute of TB & Respiratory Diseases, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]