Journal of Global Infectious Diseases

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 131--134

Helicobacter pylori in dyspepsia: Phenotypic and genotypic methods of diagnosis


Vignesh Shetty1, Mamatha Ballal2, Girisha Balaraju3, Shiran Shetty3, Ganesh C Pai3, Ramachandra Lingadakai4 
1 Enteric Diseases Division, Central Research Lab, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Surgery, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mamatha Ballal
Enteric Diseases Division, Central Research Lab, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
India

Background: Helicobacter pylori affects almost half of the world's population and therefore is one of the most frequent and persistent bacterial infections worldwide. H. pylori is associated with chronic gastritis, ulcer disease (gastric and duodenal), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Several diagnostic methods exist to detect infection and the option of one method or another depends on various genes, such as availability, advantages and disadvantages of each method, monetary value, and the age of patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with complaints of abdominal pain, discomfort, acidity, and loss of appetite were chosen for endoscopy, detailed history was contained, and a physical examination was conducted before endoscopy. Biopsies (antrum + body) were received from each patient and subjected to rapid urease test (RUT), histopathological examination (HPE), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and culture. Results: Of the total 223 biopsy specimens obtained from dyspeptic patients, 122 (54.7%) were positive for H. pylori for HPE, 109 (48.9%) by RUT, 65 (29.1%) by culture, and 117 (52.5%) by PCR. The specificity and sensitivity were as follows: RUT (99% and 88.5%), phosphoglucosamine mutase PCR assay (100% and 95.9%), and culture (100% and 53.3%), respectively. Conclusion: In this study, we compared the various diagnostic methods used to identify H. pylori infection indicating that, in comparison with histology as gold standard for detection of H. pylori infection, culture and PCR showed 100% specificity whereas RUT and PCR showed 99% and 100% sensitivity, respectively.


How to cite this article:
Shetty V, Ballal M, Balaraju G, Shetty S, Pai GC, Lingadakai R. Helicobacter pylori in dyspepsia: Phenotypic and genotypic methods of diagnosis.J Global Infect Dis 2017;9:131-134


How to cite this URL:
Shetty V, Ballal M, Balaraju G, Shetty S, Pai GC, Lingadakai R. Helicobacter pylori in dyspepsia: Phenotypic and genotypic methods of diagnosis. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Jul 16 ];9:131-134
Available from: http://www.jgid.org/article.asp?issn=0974-777X;year=2017;volume=9;issue=4;spage=131;epage=134;aulast=Shetty;type=0