Journal of Global Infectious DiseasesOfficial Publishing of INDUSEM and OPUS 12 Foundation, Inc. Users online:2214  
Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size     
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
 


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 101-104
Colonization of the preterm neonatal gut with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and its association with neonatal sepsis and maternal gut flora


1 Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission25-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance27-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication22-May-2020
 

   Abstract 


Background: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative neonatal sepsis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Mucosal colonization with these organisms in hospitals may predispose neonates to septicemia. Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and pattern of colonization of neonatal preterm gut with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and identify risk factors associated with colonization. Settings and Design: The study was a prospective observational study done in a Level 3 neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: Stool samples from preterm babies were collected soon after birth and at 1 and 3 weeks of age after consent. Maternal stool sample was collected within 48 h after the delivery. Predetermined antenatal, neonatal, and environmental risk factors were recorded. Isolation and identification of organisms was done in a standardized manner; antibiotic susceptibility was done by the Kirby–Bauer method and results interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Results: Seventy-one percent of the babies were colonized by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) at birth, and 100% were colonized by the end of the 1st week. The organisms commonly isolated were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, NFGNB (Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli), Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter. Sixty-eight percent of the babies were colonized with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms, and 5% of the babies were colonized with carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs). In the babies who developed culture-positive sepsis, 21% had concordance of strains in the gut and blood. There was no association between maternal and neonatal colonization. Conclusions: The results show that neonatal gut is colonized by GNB from birth onward. However, the rate of colonization with CRO is low. An association was also observed between colonization and late-onset sepsis.

Keywords: Carbapenem-resistant organisms, colonization, intestine, preterm

How to cite this article:
Smith A, Anandan S, Veeraraghavan B, Thomas N. Colonization of the preterm neonatal gut with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and its association with neonatal sepsis and maternal gut flora. J Global Infect Dis 2020;12:101-4

How to cite this URL:
Smith A, Anandan S, Veeraraghavan B, Thomas N. Colonization of the preterm neonatal gut with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and its association with neonatal sepsis and maternal gut flora. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 26];12:101-4. Available from: http://www.jgid.org/text.asp?2020/12/2/101/284621





   Introduction Top


The neonatal gut becomes colonized by bacteria, starting immediately after birth, and the gut microbiome quite often reflects the maternal gut flora.[1],[2],[3] The immature intestine of the preterm infants with underdeveloped immunity, barrier function, and peristalsis makes it a potential source of infection and inflammation.[4] Although not all colonization leads to infection, the pathogenicity of the Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and poor immune status of the preterm babies may predispose them to septicemia caused by these organisms.[1]

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) are an emerging problem in the world associated with high mortality and morbidity. There are several studies which have examined the pattern of neonatal gut colonization with GNB and have demonstrated the correlation between gut colonization and sepsis. However, there are only a few studies on the prevalence of CROs colonization in the gut of preterm babies.[5] Hence, this study was done to (i) determine neonatal and maternal colonization with these organisms, (ii) identify risk factors associated with colonization, and (iii) look for the association between colonization and late-onset sepsis.


   Methods Top


This was a prospective cohort study done over a period of 12 months in the neonatal unit of a tertiary care perinatal center in South India. Data were collected and entered prospectively in the given pro forma. The study was approved by the institutional research board and the ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the parents before recruitment. All very low birth weight (VLBW) inborn neonates < 1500 g born during the study period were eligible for the study. Sample size was calculated with the estimated prevalence of CROs at 5%, with a precision of 4% in eighty babies. We excluded babies with multiple congenital anomalies and babies critically ill at birth, who were unlikely to survive.

Once consent was obtained, the first stool that the baby passed was sent immediately to the microbiology laboratory, where it was plated onto blood agar, MacConkey agar, selenite F, and deoxycholate citrate agar. After overnight incubation at 37°C, suspected colonies were identified biochemically; their antibiotic susceptibility was done by Kirby–Bauer method and results interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) was defined as resistance to cephalosporins, and CRO was defined as resistance to either imipenem or meropenem. We followed up the babies up to 4 weeks of age, and subsequent stool samples were collected between 7–14 days and 21–28 days of life. Mother's stool sample was collected within 48 h of recruitment and analyzed similarly.

For molecular characterization, the whole genomic DNA was extracted from overnight colonies grown on blood agar, using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and the QIA cube instrument (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Isolates were screened for the presence of the following genes encoding for carbapenemase bla IMP, bla VIM, bla NDM, bla OXA-48, and bla KPC.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed using Qiagen master mix kit. Amplicons were visualized under ultraviolet in a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and the controls were compared simultaneously.

All babies were treated as per the unit's protocol. If any baby developed signs of sepsis, blood culture and sepsis screen were collected and antibiotics started, as per the unit protocol. Outcome measures included the number of babies colonized with CROs, time profile of colonization, association with various risk factors, similarity between organisms isolated from the neonatal gut, and those isolated from blood culture and maternal gut.

Statistical analysis for risk factors influencing gut colonization by CROs was done by multiple logistic regression.


   Results Top


One hundred and one babies (62 males) were included in the study. The mean birth weight was 1272.4 ± 176 g, whereas the mean gestational age was 31.6 ± 2.2 weeks. Sixty-seven (66.3%) of the babies were delivered by LSCS (Lower segment Caesarean section). The duration of rupture of membranes was more than 24 h in 10 (9.9%) deliveries and 25 (24.7%) mothers received intrapartum antibiotics. 16 (15.8%) babies required resuscitation at birth, 99 (98%) were given intravenous (IV) fluids, and 67 (66.3%) were given TPN (Total parenteral nutrition).

Prevalence of gut colonization with Gram-negative bacteria

Seventy-one percent of the babies were colonized at birth. All babies were colonized by the end of the 1st week and 97% persisted to have GNB in their stools at 3 weeks of life [Figure 1]. The most commonly isolated organisms in stool samples were Klebsiella (68%), Escherichia coli (66%), NFGNB (9%), Pseudomonas (7%), and Enterobacter (6%).
Figure 1: Prevalence of gut colonization with Gram-negative bacteria at birth (stool culture 1), 1 (stool culture 2), and 3 (stool culture 3) weeks

Click here to view


Sixty percent of the organisms were ESBL producers in stool culture 1 and the percentage became 67% and 76% with stool cultures 2 and 3, respectively. Seven percent of the organisms were CRO in stool cultures 1 and 2, whereas the stool culture 3 had 3% CRO [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Percentage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenem-resistant organism colonization at birth, 1, and 3 weeks

Click here to view


E. coli and Klebsiella were the most common organisms found in the mother's stool with 82% and 51% cultures growing them. Ten percent organisms in maternal stools were ESBL producers. There was 90% sensitivity to cephalosporins in contrast to 32% found in the babies and 99.5% sensitivity to carbapenems. There was no association between maternal and neonatal gut colonization.

Nineteen babies (18.8%) developed blood culture-positive sepsis, out of which only 4 (21%) had the same organism in blood and stool cultures.

The risk factors associated with colonization with CRO are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: Factors associated with gut colonization by carbapenem-resistant organisms

Click here to view


Other factors looked at were the presence of NG tube, IV fluids, TPN, and blood products administration and were not found to be significantly associated with colonization.

Multiplex PCR for the detection of carbapenem-resistant genes was done on four of the seven CRO isolates and showed the presence of New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase gene in three of them [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the detection of carbapenem-resistant genes. Lanes 1–4: Klebsiella spp. isolated from feces sample. Lanes 6–9: Positives control for IMP, VIM, NDM, and OXA-48 genes. Lanes M: Molecular weight marker (50 bp size marker). Lane 10: Negative control (no template DNA added)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Sepsis due to CROs is an emerging health problem and is associated with the increased morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients. In the DeNIS study that looked at neonatal sepsis across three neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in New Delhi, 35% of Klebsiella and 15% of E. coli were carbepenem resistant with a case fatality rate of >50%.[6] Fecal carriage is of particular importance as infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae are common. Colonization in preterm babies may be associated with diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis. As these organisms are resistant to most antibiotics, they are difficult to treat and associated with a high mortality.

Colonization of the newborn gastrointestinal tract is affected by maternal and environmental sources. The pattern of colonization is different in premature infants in an intensive care setting, when compared to healthy, term breastfed infants.[7] Preterm infants have a premature intestine with underdeveloped peristalsis, barrier function, and immunity, which makes it a source of infection and inflammation.[4],[8],[9] Concordance of colonizing and invasive strains has been demonstrated previously.[10] A study done in New York demonstrated 98% concordance between surveillance cultures caused by the same strain and same gentamicin susceptibility profile and later bloodstream infections.[11]

In our study, we found preterm gut colonization rates of 71%, 100%, and 97% at birth, week 1, and week 3 of life. Studies done in the northern parts of the country have shown similar colonization rates.[1],[12] This is higher than colonization rates in the West.[13]

The most common organisms isolated from the stool cultures in our study were Klebsiella and E. coli. These organisms were consistently found across all cultures. A recent study done in the USA on 32 VLBW infants has recorded relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, and Bacteroides organisms.[14]

During this study, the overall resistance to ESBLwas 68% and that to CRO was 5%. A recent study done in the northern part of India has reported carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae gut colonization in neonates as 8.7%,[5] whereas a study done in Germany has shown ESBL Enterobacteriaceae colonization rate in preterm infants to be 5.7%.[15] In an Italian study, the ESBL colonization rate was found to be 27.1%,[16] whereas a study done in Cambodia showed colonization by a CRO in 7.5% of cases.[17]

During our study, 19 (18.8%) babies had positive blood cultures. Nine (47.3%) out of the nineteen babies had the same organism causing sepsis and colonizing the gut, but only 4 (21%) had the same sensitivity pattern, suggesting that the source for these was from the neonatal gut. It was interesting to note that the two babies with CRO sepsis had CRO in stools also. Concordance of colonizing and invasive strains has been demonstrated in other studies.[17],[18],[19]

Mothers' stool cultures were also analyzed for the presence of GNB in our study. GNB could be isolated from all except two samples. The common organisms here also are E. coli, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter. In a study done in Sri Lanka, it was found that mothers were colonized with Enterobacteriaceae in 18.8% of the cases.[20] The German study mentioned earlier has shown the prevalence of ESBL Enterobacteriaceae colonization among mothers as 11.1%.[15]

However, what we found was that the sensitivity pattern of the mothers' gut flora was strikingly different from that of the babies.


   Conclusions Top


The gut of preterm babies is colonized with potentially pathogenic bacteria, starting almost immediately after birth, although the rate of colonization with CROs is low.

In cases of culture-positive sepsis, concordance of invasive and colonizing strains was found in 21% of the cases. No correlation existed between maternal and neonatal gut flora, suggesting that the environment contributes to the gut colonization of preterm NICU babies.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study was funded by the Institutional Research Board.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Das P, Singh AK, Pal T, Dasgupta S, Ramamurthy T, Basu S. Colonization of the gut with Gram-negative bacilli, its association with neonatal sepsis and its clinical relevance in a developing country. J Med Microbiol 2011;60:1651-60.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Staude B, Oehmke F, Lauer T, Behnke J, Göpel W, Schloter M, et al. The microbiome and preterm birth: A change in paradigm with profound implications for pathophysiologic concepts and novel therapeutic strategies. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:7218187.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gritz EC, Bhandari V. The human neonatal gut microbiome: A brief review. Front Pediatr 2015;3:17.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Korpela K, Blakstad EW, Moltu SJ, Strømmen K, Nakstad B, Rønnestad AE, et al. Intestinal microbiota development and gestational age in preterm neonates. Sci Rep 2018;8:2453.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Singh NP, Choudhury DD, Gupta K, Rai S, Batra P, Manchanda V, et al. Predictors for gut colonization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2018;46:e31-e35.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Investigators of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study (DeNIS) collaboration. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: A cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:e752-60.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Parm U, Metsvaht T, Sepp E, Ilmoja ML, Pisarev H, Pauskar M, et al. Risk factors associated with gut and nasopharyngeal colonization by common Gram-negative species and yeasts in neonatal intensive care units patients. Early Hum Dev 2011;87:391-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chernikova DA, Madan JC, Housman ML, Zain-Ul-Abideen M, Lundgren SN, Morrison HG, et al. The premature infant gut microbiome during the first 6 weeks of life differs based on gestational maturity at birth. Pediatr Res 2018;84:71-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chi C, Xue Y, Lv N, Hao Y, Liu R, Wang Y, et al. Longitudinal gut bacterial colonization and its influencing factors of low birth weight infants during the first 3 months of life. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1105.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dutta S, Ganesh M, Ray P, Narang A. Intestinal colonization among very low birth weight infants in first week of life. Indian Pediatr 2014;51:807-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Smith A, Saiman L, Zhou J, Della-Latta P, Jia H, Graham PL 3rd. Concordance of gastrointestinal tract colonization and subsequent bloodstream infections with gram-negative bacilli in very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29:831-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Choudhury DD, Singh NP, Rai S, Batra P, Manchanda V. Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Neonatal Gut Colonization: A Future Concern in Healthcare Settings; 2018. Available from:/paper/Carbapenem-resistant-Enterobacteriaceae-neonatal-%3A-Choudhury-Singh/e2b525a2f06127279e30e4206ca3b0c96d13b820. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 27].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Madan JC, Salari RC, Saxena D, Davidson L, O'Toole GA, Moore JH, et al. Gut microbial colonisation in premature neonates predicts neonatal sepsis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F456-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wandro S, Osborne S, Enriquez C, Bixby C, Arrieta A, Whiteson K. The microbiome and metabolome of preterm infant stool are personalized and not driven by health outcomes, including necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis. mSphere 2018;3. pii: e00104-18.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Denkel LA, Schwab F, Kola A, Leistner R, Garten L, von Weizsäcker K, et al. The mother as most important risk factor for colonization of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E). J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2230-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mammina C, Di Carlo P, Cipolla D, Giuffrè M, Casuccio A, Di Gaetano V, et al. Surveillance of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a neonatal intensive care unit: Prominent role of cross transmission. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:222-30.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Turner P, Pol S, Soeng S, Sar P, Neou L, Chea P, et al. High prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative colonization in hospitalized Cambodian infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016;35:856-61.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Carl MA, Ndao IM, Springman AC, Manning SD, Johnson JR, Johnston BD, et al. Sepsis from the gut: The enteric habitat of bacteria that cause late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:1211-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Shaw AG, Sim K, Randell P, Cox MJ, McClure ZE, Li MS, et al. Late-onset bloodstream infection and perturbed maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiota in premature infants. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132923.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Nanayakkara D, Liyanapathirana V, Kandauda C, Gihan C, Ekanayake A, Adasooriya D. Maternal vaginal colonization with selected potential pathogens of neonatal sepsis in the era of antimicrobial resistance, a single center experience from Sri Lanka. BMC Infect Dis 2018;18:351.  Back to cited text no. 20
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Niranjan Thomas
Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632 004, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_104_19

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed484    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Contact Us
2008 Journal of Global Infectious Diseases | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th December, 2008