Journal of Global Infectious DiseasesOfficial Publishing of INDUSEM and OPUS 12 Foundation, Inc. Users online:758  
Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size     
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
 


 
   Table of Contents     
MICROBIOLOGY REPORT  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 123-124
Prevalence and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli from a tertiary care hospital in India


1 Department of Microbiology, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication26-Aug-2019
 

   Abstract 


The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and to characterize the carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli by various phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods, and its performance was compared to the gold standard genotypic method. The prevalence of carbapenemase-resistant E. coli was found to be 65%. The phenotypic methods evaluated are cost-effective and can be used in resource-limited laboratories to rule out carbapenem resistance.

Keywords: Carbapenemases, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, metallo-β-lactamases

How to cite this article:
Govindaswamy A, Bajpai V, Khurana S, Batra P, Mathur P, Malhotra R. Prevalence and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli from a tertiary care hospital in India. J Global Infect Dis 2019;11:123-4

How to cite this URL:
Govindaswamy A, Bajpai V, Khurana S, Batra P, Mathur P, Malhotra R. Prevalence and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli from a tertiary care hospital in India. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 22];11:123-4. Available from: http://www.jgid.org/text.asp?2019/11/3/123/265401





   Introduction Top


The high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a growing public issue worldwide.  Escherichia More Details coli is one of the most common causative agents of a wide range of clinical infections varying from meningitis, urinary tract infections, and sepsis.[1] Carbapenems are the only antibiotic option left for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant E. coli. However, the emergence of carbapenem resistance leads to the failure of empirical therapy with carbapenems.[2],[3] Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing E. coli by various phenotypic tests, and its performance was compared to genotypic-based detection method (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]).


   Microbiology Report Top


The study was conducted after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee (Ref No: IEC/NP-123/2011). A total of 103 clinically significant E. coli strains isolated various clinical specimens such as blood 7/103 (6.7%), sterile body fluids 3/103 (2.9%), endotracheal aspirate 27/103 (26.2%), pus 39/103 (37.8%), and urine 27/103 (26.2%) were screened for carbapenemase production using disk diffusion method; minimum inhibitory concentration was determination by E-test and Vitek-2 system. Phenotypic confirmation for carbapenemase production was done using Modified Hodge test, double disk synergy test (DDST), boronic acid (BA) disc test, and combined disk test (CDT). The results were interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.[4] The presence of bla IMP, bla VIM, bla OXA, bla KPC, and bla NDM was detected by PCR using the primers described in [Table 1]. The PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min and primer annealing at 56°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of DNA amplification at 94°C for 30 s and elongation at 72°C for 1 min.[5]Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC BAA1705) (KPC positive) and Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC BAA2468) (NDM1 positive) were the control strains used in the study. Among the 103 isolates, 94 (91.26%) were suspected to have resistance to carbapenem by disk diffusion method. Disk diffusion method using ertapenem yielded the highest sensitivity of 71.2% and positive predictive value of 94.4%, making it the best test for screening. Among the other tests used for the detection of metallo-β-lactamases, CDT using meropenem–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid showed the highest sensitivity of 58.8% and specificity of 66.6% in comparison with PCR. DDST using ceftazidime and 2- mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) showed the highest sensitivity of 87.2% and specificity of 33.3% in comparison with PCR. The phenotypic detection of KPC-possessing E. coli isolates was evaluated using BA disk tests using eight different β-lactam antibiotics. The results of BA disk test in comparison with PCR are depicted in [Table 2]. Based on the PCR assay, the most common gene detected was bla NDM-1, 58/94 (61.7%) in our study. The remaining isolates, 36/94 (38.2%), harbored combination of either of the genes encoding bla NDM-1, bla IMP, bla VIM, bla KPC, and bla OXA-46. The prevalence of various carbapenemase genes is depicted in [Table 3].
Table 1: Primers used for the detection of carbapenemase genes

Click here to view
Table 2: Results of the boronic acid disk tests for isolates with different β-lactamase contents

Click here to view
Table 3: Prevalence of carbapenemase genes

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Our study had demonstrated a very high prevalence of carbapenemases and carbapenem resistance encoding genes in E. coli clinical isolates. The situation is alarming because there are very few therapeutic options available in the near future for these multidrug-resistant organisms. Combination of both phenotypic and genotypic methods would serve as a better tool for the identification of these CRE.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the laboratory technicians for helping in specimen processing and performing various phenotypic and genotypic tests for carbapenemase detection in E. coli clinical isolates.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was funded by a grant from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (project code: I-800, grant number: 5/3/3/26/2011-ECD-I). We acknowledge the financial support of ICMR for the performance of this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Candan ED, Aksöz N, Candan ED, Aksöz N. Escherichia coli: Characteristics of carbapenem resistance and virulence factors. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2017;60. e17160416 Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-89132017000100415&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. [Last accessed on 2018 Feb 27].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sekar R, Srivani S, Amudhan M, Mythreyee M. Carbapenem resistance in a rural part of Southern India: Escherichia coli versus Klebsiella spp. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:781-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
AlTamimi M, AlSalamah A, AlKhulaifi M, AlAjlan H. Comparison of phenotypic and PCR methods for detection of carbapenemases production by enterobacteriaceae. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017;24:155-61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
M100S27 | Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 2017. Available from: https://www.clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 19].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Khurana S, Mathur P, Kapil A, Valsan C, Behera B. Molecular epidemiology of beta-lactamase producing nosocomial gram-negative pathogens from North and South Indian hospitals. J Med Microbiol 2017;66:999-1004.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Purva Mathur
Department of Microbiology, 2nd Floor, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_68_18

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Microbiology Report
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed110    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Contact Us
2008 Journal of Global Infectious Diseases | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th December, 2008