Journal of Global Infectious DiseasesOfficial Publishing of INDUSEM and OPUS 12 Foundation, Inc. Users online:624  
Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size     
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 315-317
Drug resistant urinary isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species


1 Department of Microbiology, Dr. H. S. J. Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication17-Aug-2010
 

How to cite this article:
Sharma J, Gulati N, Chander J. Drug resistant urinary isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. J Global Infect Dis 2010;2:315-7

How to cite this URL:
Sharma J, Gulati N, Chander J. Drug resistant urinary isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Oct 19];2:315-7. Available from: http://www.jgid.org/text.asp?2010/2/3/315/68547


Sir,

The emergence of antibiotic resistance and its spread has been a serious challenge to the clinicians. Penicillinase represents the infancy of antibiotic resistance, which was followed by penicillin-inactivating enzymes. Recently the focus of clinicians has shifted to non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative pathogens responsible for hospital-acquired infections (HAI). [1] Further, if we talk about intensive care units (ICUs), Acinetobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. are frequently encountered. [2] Acinetobacter has emerged as an important and problematic human pathogen as it is the causative agent of several types of infections, including pneumonia, meningitis, septicemia and urinary tract infections (UTI). It is ranked second after Pseudomonas among the nosocomial, aerobic, nonfermentative, gram-negative bacilli pathogens. Isolates from both the genera are multidrug resistant and sometimes also exhibit pan resistance. The aim of our study was to find the prevalence of multidrug resistance and pan-drug resistance among gram-negative uropathogens.

The isolates isolated from hospitalized patients at Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, were collected in the Department of Microbiology from January 2007 to June 2007. The isolates were identified using routine conventional methods based upon microscopic findings, colony morphology and enzymatic characters. Routine antibiotic sensitivity testing was done by disc-diffusion method according to the recommendations of Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). [3]

The isolates were defined as multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes if they were resistant to more than two classes of antibiotics, cephamycin, aminoglycoside, carbapenem and fluoroquinolones. [4] The isolates were considered to be pan-drug-resistant (PDR) phenotypes if they showed diminished susceptibility to almost all the antibiotics recommended for empirical therapy. [4]

A total of 4912 urine samples were received in the department within the period of 6 months. Out of these, 1409 samples grew pathogens. The details of different bacterial species encountered in urine samples are given in [Table 1]. The most frequent organism was E. coli, followed by K. pneumoniae. Candida sp. was the commonest fungal isolate. [Table 2] depicts the distribution of MDR and PDR isolates amongst gram-negative urinary pathogens. Maximum numbers of MDR and PDR isolates were observed in P. aeruginosa (72%); followed by Acinetobacter sp., where the value reached up to 62%. The frequency of multidrug resistance and pan-drug resistance in K. pneumoniae was 49%; and in E. coli, 28%.
Table 1 :Details of urinary isolates investigated in the study


Click here to view
Table 2 :Distribution of MDR and PDR isolates amongst gram-negative bacteria


Click here to view


Amongst all isolates, MDR and PDR isolates were mainly distributed amongst gram-negative bacteria, specifically focused at P. aeruginosa followed by Acinetobacter (71.7% and 62.6%, respectively). P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter have in some cases expressed resistance to all clinically available compounds. P. aeruginosa possesses more tools for defying the activity of antimicrobial agents than virtually any other microorganism. [5] Like P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter has been found to express a variety of different resistance mechanisms, including production of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, ESBLs and carbapenemases, as well as through changes in outer membrane proteins, penicillin-binding proteins and topoisomerases. [6]

During the last decade, efforts to combat multidrug-resistant microorganisms mainly focused on gram-positive bacteria. Since the number of reports on infections caused by gram-negative microorganisms, for which no adequate therapeutic options exist, is increasing, it is time to intensify attention towards gram-negative resistance.

We must remain mindful that indiscriminate use of any antibacterial agent will inevitably lead to resistance. As such, continued emphasis on effective infection-control measures and judicious and parsimonious use of available antimicrobial agents will remain mainstays in any reasonable strategy to maximize the usefulness of available antimicrobial agents.

 
   References Top

1.Gaynes R, Edwards JR. Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:848-54.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial blood stream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24, 179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:309-17.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: sixteenthinformational supplement. CLSI document M100-S16. Wayne, Pa: CLSI; 2006.   Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Paterson DL. The epidemiological profile of infections with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:S43-8.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Rice LB. Challenges in identifying new antimicrobial agents effective for treating infections with Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonasaeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:S100-5.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Gales AC, Jones RN, Forward KR, Linares J, Sader HS, Verhoef J. Emerging importance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as pathogens in seriously ill patients: geographic patterns, epidemiological features, and trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-1999). Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:S104-13.  Back to cited text no. 6      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Jyoti Sharma
Department of Microbiology, Dr. H. S. J. Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Panjab University, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-777X.68547

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2332    
    Printed129    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded99    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Contact Us
2008 Journal of Global Infectious Diseases | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th December, 2008